Once paying customers upload a photo, the program spits out all other images it has of the person, plus information on who he or she likely is. The firm's technology is based on a biometric database of billions of photos scraped from websites including Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram. Analysts estimate that the global market was worth around $10 billion (€8.25 billion) last year.Īnd yet no other firm has sparked as much backlash as Clearview AI. Hundreds of companies around the world are working on facial recognition software. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video How Clearview AI surveillance works ![]() Russia: Total surveillance via facial recognition "And even if it is accurate, there is also immense potential for … human rights abuses," he said. He added that facial recognition technology is often inaccurate and prone to discriminate against minorities. "We have seen facial recognition being used in Russia to detain peaceful protesters, we have seen facial recognition being used on children in Argentina," Toh told the conference, which was held mostly online due to the pandemic. The technology uses AI to identify individuals in images. Clearview AI's Hoan Ton-That says that the company's technology uses publicly available information Image: privatĪmos Toh, a senior researcher at NGO Human Rights Watch, warned during the GMF that governments and companies increasingly deploy facial recognition to spy on their citizens and customers. The controversy highlights how, as artificial intelligence technology matures, it could give rise to surveillance on an unprecedented scale. ![]() They argue that the software - a search engine for faces combing through billions of photos - violates the UK’s and the EU's strict privacy rules. Privacy activists recently lodged data protection complaints against Clearview AI in five European countries. "All the information we collect is collected legally and it is all publicly available information," Hoan Ton-That said Monday during DW's Global Media Forum (GMF), addressing criticism that the firm's controversial technology infringes on the privacy of hundreds of millions. "As the Representative of two of the first cities on the east coast to outlaw the use of this technology, I'm proud to sponsor this bill and make clear that our government has no business spying on its civilians.You don't want your face to appear in the database of Clearview AI? "This bill would boldly affirm the civil liberties of every person in this country and protect their right to live free of unjust and discriminatory surveillance by government and law enforcement," she added. Pressley, in a statement last year backing the federal ban on government use of facial recognition software, said "Black and brown people are already over-surveilled and over-policed, and it's critical that we prevent government agencies from using this faulty technology to surveil communities of color even further." "States and local efforts are also continuing, with communities in California, Washington, Nebraska, Illinois, and Massachusetts and more still pushing forward local legislation banning the technology. ![]() We need action from lawmakers in Albany and at City Hall to prohibit the use of facial recognition technologies outright to protect New Yorkers' privacy and other fundamental rights."įacial recognition out of control? Half of US adults have their faces on police databasesįacial-recognition databases used by the FBI and state police hold images of 117 million US adults, according to new research. "Short of this litigation and these disclosures, the public would never know the extent to which NYPD employed Clearview - a controversial tool that other localities have banned outright. "The NYPD has purposefully kept New Yorkers in the dark on the controversial surveillance technologies that the Department deploys citywide," said Jonathan McCoy, staff attorney with the digital forensics unit at The Legal Aid Society in a statement. The documents also showed that the officers who had access to Clearview AI even used it on their personal devices and had gotten login and password information sent directly to their email accounts, a major cybersecurity risk with wide-ranging implications. The Legal Aid Society noted that it is still unclear if courts and lawyers were notified that the technology was used to identify suspects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |